Ride Your Own Bike

Like Sally, one day the realization will come that your best interests rely on you steering your own bike – in the direction that you want to go!

The ultimate goal is to get your three substantial piles going – house, income and investments. But before any of this happens you have to develop a mindset … I want to be in control of my financial life.

You must gain control over your money or the lack of it will forever control you. —

Dave Ramsey – Author of The Total Money Makeover

If you don’t take control, perhaps you’re plan is to take all your affairs to a financial adviser one day. Most people will feel the need for financial advice at some stage but only 20% of Australians have a financial advisor. The current structure makes getting advice a difficult step – and it’s not the financial advisors fault.

The pricing problem of Financial Advice in Australia

64% of survey participants agreed that financial advisers were too expensive.

ASIC Survey August 2019 – Financial advice: What consumers really think

The Australian Government passed a piece of legislation known as the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) in 2012. FoFA was a series of laws that were supposed to improve the quality and transparency of financial advice. One of the main purposes was banning conflicted remuneration – where advisers were recommending products that gave them good commissions. While FoFA and the Hayne Royal Commission were well intended and vital in restoring some trust in the sector – there have been some unintended consequences.

(The Financial Services Royal Commission) identified the problem of conflicted remuneration without providing a mass market solution.

Graham Hand, Firstlinks – FoFA, the Failure of Financial Advice

There has been a huge rise in regulatory red tape and the associated compliance costs for financial planners. A combination of these costs, the big banks dumping their financial advice arms, and the need for upgraded qualifications has put this sector in crisis. The total number of licenced advisers is set to drop by a third in the next few years.

There is broad recognition that financial advisors have expertise that the normal punter does not have. However, the biggest barrier to getting financial advice is the expense. One of the big problems is that when you engage a financial advisor, they are obligated to present you with a full Statement of Advice (SOA). On the surface this makes sense, the client would want a document that takes into account your own circumstances and outlines the fees and risks of each strategy. However, according to one planner, the SOA has turned into pages of jargon, repeated disclosure and boring generic graphs. These statements are weighty tomes that take many hours to prepare. Sadly, they seem to confuse the actual advice and provide no real value to the client.

A full Statement of Advice (SOA) runs over 100 pages and the need to review all circumstances and develop a plan takes 10 to 15 hours and costs between $3,000 and $5,000 depending on complexity.

Graham Hand, Firstlinks – FoFA, the Failure of Financial Advice
From FirstLinks – FoFA, the Failure of Financial Advice, Take 2

James Kirby from The Australian uses the example of paying annual adviser fees fees of $3000 and he supposes that the structured advice that you receive will match the 4.3% pa return of the new Magellan retirement income product Magellan FuturePay (FPAY). He points out that for an investment of $500 000 and an expected FPAY return of $21 500, your advice fees would be 14% of your earnings. This does not make sense to him … or Slack Investor.

James Kirby suggests that a better model for the regulators to adopt would be that you could approach a financial adviser for advice that you need at the time … and pay the financial adviser for this “niche” advice. This is not possible under current legislation.

Take charge

So, with full service financial advice gravitating towards high net wealth clients, what is the average punter supposed to do? Robo-advisors such as Stockspot could be part of the solution. This automated service can provide help with allocation of assets other services that will suit your age and risk profile. But there are so many more financial questions you might want to handball to your financial adviser if you could afford one. Well, if you can’t … it’s up to you.

Decide what you want to achieve in the finance sense. Go through the savings basics and get your savings rate up. Take charge on where your money goes, get your superannuation set, reduce any unnecessary fees that you are paying, set a target on your financial piles.

Educate yourself on things financial. There are some great books. The Barefoot Investor is an excellent start. Some fabulous podcasts The Australian Finance Podcast will get you going and there are heaps of other Slack Investor favourites. Get involved and start to enjoy the immense freedom and satisfaction of riding your own bike.

Happiness is not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

A Further look at three pile theory … and May 2021 – End of Month Update

Slack Investor presented his version of a bucket strategy – The “Three Pile Theory”. It is the three pillars of a House, Stable Income, and Investments that have supported me through most of my working life and now the three piles are still supporting me in early retirement.

These piles have been continually interacting with each other as I was trying to build them all up. At the start, the Prince of all piles was a good income and, as I have very poor entrepreneurial skills, the key for me to get a good income was to have a good education. I was lucky enough to have parents that encouraged me to go as far as my wit would take me.

Without education you’re not going anywhere in this world

Malcolm X

When originally talking about three pile theory, I glossed over the retirement phase and how the investment and stable income piles can keep you going … hopefully, for a long time. By retirement, if possible your house will be paid off – and this will be left as a dormant house pile which keeps giving back in lots of ways … but only as a last resort will you use it to fund your lifestyle in retirement!

Lets do the sums on just two piles – Your Retirement Fund

Consider a retirement fund with just two piles – Stable Income and Investments. In order to generate 4% of income per year, you need have most of your retirement fund in investments rather than stable income. According to his two pile theory, Rob Berger from Forbes Magazine recommends that you should have between 50% and 75% of the retirement fund in the investments pile 0f equities (stocks). Decide on a ratio of stable income to investments that you can sleep well with – a higher amount investments will mean potentially more growth … but definitely more volatility.

A bit of mathematics here … my original ratio of house:stable income:investments was 30%:20%:50%f Net Worth. When taking my house out of the calculations, my ratio of Stable Income: Investments is about 30%:70% – this is just the numbers that I am comfortable with.

My original plan was to use dividends and interest from the two piles of my retirement fund to give me income. That means taking out money from both piles every year – even when stock markets have fallen. Rob Bergen points out that this is exactly the wrong approach. Taking dividends out reduces the investments pile – it has the same effect on your investments pile as if you sold some of your stocks. In a down-trending stock market, for your long-term investments pile, you want to use those dividends to reinvest in a stock market that is undervalued.

(Using the traditional bucket strategy), assets are taken from (Investments) when market prices have fallen, which is exactly when dividends should be reinvested.

Rob Berger – outlining the folly of taking money out of your Investments account when the market is falling.

How to make your piles last in retirement phase – Rebalancing the Retirement Fund

This heading has Slack Investor lapsing into what my mother called “Plumber’s Humour”. Using the Rob Berger simple strategy, you maintain your piles. Even though you have the competing interests of wanting to withdraw annual amounts for a great lifestyle, and yet, keeping enough in your retirement fund to generate future income for many many years. There are lots of articles on buckets to fund your retirement but, it can get complicated – I really like the clarity of Rob Berger’s approach. He explains in detail how the traditional bucket strategy is flawed.

By the time you retire, you will have a good idea of your expenses, While you are healthy and fit, add a good chunk of income to fund some travel. At the start of the financial year, this amount gets withdrawn to your cash account to fund yearly living expenses. The remainder is your retirement fund comprising of Stable Income pile (Annuities/Bonds/Term Deposits/Fixed Interest) and Investments pile. Slack Investor is happy with 70% of his Retirement Fund in Investments (Equities/Stocks).

Set up a ratio of Stable income: Investments in Your Retirement Fund that you are happy with and take your annual expenses out of the pile that is over allocated at the end of the year. In the above case, Investments.

In a good year for investments (outlined above) your next years annual income requirements can be withdrawn from the investments pile. If you get a bad year for investments, then dip into the stable income pile. Take out enough from each pile so that after your yearly expenses withdrawal, the initial allocations are roughly intact – I should do some algebra here to make this easier … but you can do it for your homework!

Using this method, you are always selling from your investments pile when the market is high and buying when the market is low – masterful investing, Warren Buffet would approve!

May 2021 – End of Month Update

Slack Investor remains IN for Australian index shares, the US Index S&P 500 and the FTSE 100.

There were modest rises in all followed overseas markets (S&P 500 +0.6%, and the FTSE 100 +0.8%). The Australian stock market is powering on (ASX 200 +1. 9%) despite Slack Investor and the state of Victoria being in a (hopefully only one week!) COVID inspired lock down. All Index pages and charts have been updated to reflect the monthly changes – (ASX IndexUK IndexUS Index).